梦工场是程宗灏先生为深圳留下的文化遗产。在梦工场建成后的 18 年间，其周边环境经历了骤变。如今，一座城市公共剧场，跨街之隔 18m 处便是居住社区的落位，引人发问。而原本作为半室外剧场的梦工场，也因演出时声音的扰民问题被投诉。在停止运营 5 年之后，政府重新立项，梦工场也迎来了改造的时刻。

Theater of Dream was originally an important public building, a great cultural legacy for Shenzhen left by architect Cheng Zonghao. 18 years after its completion, radical changes have taken place in the surrounding urban environment. Today, an urban public theater situating only 18 meters away from the residential community is bound to raise issues on urban planning. As a semi-outdoor theater, it received repeated noise complaints during performances. After stopping operation for five years, the government decided to re-launch the project, and thus Theater of Dream ushers in the moment of rebirth.

▼建筑概览，Preview

©郭靖

梦工场的基本体量，由扇形的主楼和三角形的配楼组成。主楼作为剧场看台，高层配楼整合舞台、课室、办公等辅助用房。两者一前一后的体量关系，与这座热带城市的茂密植被，共同定义出一处质量特殊的外部空间。

改造前的主楼，是一座没有气候边界的半室外剧场，类型上如同深圳早期的“大家乐”舞台，也像是一座希腊剧场。站在看台的最高点，场地致密的植被与城市景观尽收眼底。

Theater of Dream is basically made up of a fan-shaped main building and a triangle-shaped side building. The main building is used as the grandstand, while the high-rise side building integrates stage, classrooms, offices and other subsidiary rooms. With the side building standing behind the main building as well as the dense plant cover of this tropical city, an urban public space with special character is defined.

Before renovation, as a semi-outdoor theater without climate boundary, the main building resembled a Greek amphitheater. Stepping on the highest point of the grandstand, a panoramic view of the thick vegetative-cover embracing the entire site as well as the city landscape is perceived.

▼梦工场体量关系，The Volume of Theater of Dream©丘建筑设计事务所

▼改造前街角视点，View from the Street Corner before Renovation

©丘建筑设计事务所

我们面临的核心问题，并非像欧洲城市里，在稳定城市秩序下的建筑单体讨论，而是在城市“增量时期”遗留的问题中，通过建筑单体的机会，重新建立场地秩序，弱化上层规划遗留的问题，在“存量阶段”的城市空间里，让实体空间重新建立和解。

需要改造的不是建筑单体，是与建筑单体接驳的整个城市空间。

The critical task is not the discussion of a single building under the stable urban context in most European cities, but to reset the order of the site and efface historical problems left from the “incremental period” of urban planning, trying to take full advantage of this renovation opportunity to arrive at a new reconciliation of urban spaces in its “stock period”. What calls for renovation is not only the building itself but the entire urban space bordering the building.

▼左：改造前剧场看台；右：看台与城市 Left: The Grandstand before renovation; Right:The Grandstand and the City©丘建筑设计事务所